Recent Question/Assignment

Skip To Content
Dashboard
Account
Dashboard
Courses
Calendar
Inbox
History
Studio
Help

N8002AssignmentsAssessment 1: An e-poster
Home
Announcements
Syllabus
Modules
Discussions
Assignment Instructions
Assignments
Marks
Microsoft Teams meetings
Virtual Class Room
Zoom
Student Support
Support Session Bookings
Assessment 1: An e-poster
Start Assignment
Due Sunday by 23:59 Points 20 Submitting a file upload (Turnitin enabled) Available Nov 15 at 0:00 - Dec 11 at 23:59
Assessment 1: An e-Poster (20%), due week 4 (20 marks)
Create an e-Poster that illustrates your understanding of how to apply reflection theories/models to the specific clinical situation. Choose one theory/model you have learned in this unit and justify how the theory is relevant to address a selected clinical situation. This assessment has a weighting of 20%. The assessment should be structured under the same headings as the marking rubric, please consider the How to prepare and submit assessment: A Guide for IHM Students carefully as you construct your assessment. 
How to make ePosters
The ePoster assignment is the first multimedia assignment of your course. Displaying information visually is an important communication skill. The following video introduces the basics of making an ePoster using a free online application known as Canva, which you can find online by clicking this link (Links to an external site.).
https://youtu.be/TsnO98InJlE?list=PLJHv5fhgePsk3Ig2TKf6_a-8JauBsZuVZ (Links to an external site.)
 
If you are using the free version of the ePoster app, it does now allow you to export in .pdf format. Various ways to convert your ePoster to .pdf format are discussed in this video:
https://youtu.be/fheLmJwBepE?list=PLJHv5fhgePsk3Ig2TKf6_a-8JauBsZuVZ (Links to an external site.)
 
Instructions
Identify a clinical /situation/issue and select ONE nursing model/theory that can be used to address that issue.
Minimum four references are required. These references must be = 7 years old.
Define the model, justify how it can be used to address your topic, and link its elements to the nursing standards for practice and codes of conduct in Australia
and USE APA 7th format for assessment writing and referencing.
Information cited from unreliable websites, pamphlets or magazines is not acceptable for this paper.
Your poster needs to be created in a single document, using graphic software such as Canva, Adobe, Piktochart, or any other helpful tool and submitted to the Canvas along with the word document.
Students have to submit a word document with all information in the poster into CANVAS to check similarity.
Therefore, students will be submitting two files when they are submitting the assignment. One is the word document (with the same information in the e-poster) and the other one is the e-poster.
Assessment Instructions
1. Identify a clinical situation and select a theory/model that can be used to address the situation.
2. Select literature/research articles that provide the strongest evidence for your topic. Your articles must be =7 years old.
3. Define and identify the elements of the theory, justify, and illustrate how they can be used to address your topic.
4. Use APA Format for referencing.
5. Your poster will be marked according to the rubric/marking guide below.
6. Your poster must be created as a single document, using graphic software such as Canva, Adobe, Piktochart, or any other helpful tool, and submitted to the Turnitin.
 
 
Rubric
e-Poster
e-Poster
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Knowledge application
10 to 7.9 pts
High Distinction ( 80%)
An excellent demonstration of a reflection theory/model, consistently linked to the specific aspects of the selected topic.
7.9 to 6.9 pts
Distinction (70-79%)
A very good demonstration of the theory/model, clearly linked to the specific aspects of the selected topic.
6.9 to 5.9 pts
Credit (60-69%)
A good demonstration of the reflection theory/model, linked to the specific aspects of the selected topic.
5.9 to 4.9 pts
Pass (50-59%)
A basic demonstration of the theory/model, limited links to the specific aspects of the selected topic.
4.9 to 0 pts
Fail (0-49%)
A poor demonstration of the reflection theory/model, no links to the selected topic.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Design and structure
5 to 3.95 pts
High Distinction ( 80%)
The poster has an excellent design and layout; all elements are clearly visible, creatively organised and very easy to follow.
3.95 to 3.45 pts
Distinction (70-79%)
The poster has a nice design and layout. It reflects the student’s creativity and is neat and easy to read.
3.45 to 2.95 pts
Credit (60-69%)
The poster is well designed, and all the elements are visible.
2.95 to 2.45 pts
Pass (50-59%)
The poster has an acceptable design and layout but needs improvement to make all elements clearly visible.
2.45 to 0 pts
Fail (0-49%)
The poster needs significant improvement. It is not easy to read. The elements are not clearly visible.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Academic style/ References
5 to 3.95 pts
High Distinction ( 80%)
Credible and relevant references used; accurate use of APA referencing style on all occasions; there are no errors in grammar, spelling or punctuation that impact readability.
3.95 to 3.45 pts
Distinction (70-79%)
Credible and relevant references used; accurate use of APA referencing style on most occasions; there are minimal errors in grammar, spelling, or punctuation that impact readability.
3.45 to 2.95 pts
Credit (60-69%)
Most references are credible and relevant; some inaccuracies in APA referencing style; there are few errors in grammar, spelling or punctuation that impact readability.
2.95 to 2.45 pts
Pass (50-59%)
Some references are credible and relevant; several inaccuracies in APA referencing style; there are errors in grammar, spelling, or punctuation that impact readability.
2.45 to 0 pts
Fail (0-49%)
Most references lack credibility and relevance; significant inaccuracies with APA referencing style; there are substantial errors in grammar, spelling or punctuation that impacts readability.
5 pts
Total Points: 20